‎Terrorism Conviction: Why I Didn’t Sentence Nnamdi Kanu To De@th – Justice Omotoso.


‎Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court has explained why he declined to impose the de@th sentence on Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).

‎Justice Omotosho, while delivering his sentence on the Abia-born IPOB leader, said that he was moved to temper justice with mercy.

‎Quoting a portion of the book of Matthew, Justice Omotosho pointed out that Jesus Christ taught His followers to show mercy.

‎He said that the sentence for Nnamdi Kanu was the de@th penalty but that he had to show mercy because of the teachings of the Holy Book.

‎He also mentioned that the international community now frowns upon de@th sentences, adding that if not for this, the IPOB leader deserved to die.

‎Omotosho handed down the judgment on Thursday following a landmark ruling in the trial of the IPOB leader.

‎The judge had earlier convicted Kanu on all seven counts of terrorism brought against him by the Department of State Services.

‎In his judgment, the judge stated that the prosecution presented sufficient and credible evidence to prove its case.

‎He noted that Kanu failed to enter a defence, instead choosing to rest his case on the prosecution’s evidence—a gamble the court said left it with no option but to convict.

‎The judge criticised Kanu’s approach to achieving a Biafra nation through violence, characterising it as the action of a terrorist group.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *